La Verkin now feels vindicated in declaring town "U.N.-free zone"

2/20/03

By Nancy Perkins
Deseret News correspondent

LA VERKIN, Washington County, Utah The southern Utah community of La Verkin received international attention much of it negative when it essentially, if temporarily, banned the United Nations from town two years ago.
Now, buoyed by a state legislative committee's passage of a resolution asking Congress to get the United States out of the United Nations, one City Council member in this rural town, a gateway to Zion National Park, is ready to leap into geopolitics once again.


"This helps give our referendum credibility," said Al Snow after reviewing the language of the resolution before the Legislature. "Everybody tried to make me out that I was paranoid about the U.N. or something. I feel like I'm vindicated."


Web extra
Feb. 11, 2003: Utah House committee advances anti-U.N. resolution

Jan. 17, 2002: La Verkin repeals U.N. ordinance

July 26, 2001: La Verkin waters down U.N. law

July 5, 2001: La Verkin Council declares town a U.N.-Free Zone


City Council members, in a 3-2 vote on July 4, 2001, passed a controversial "United Nations Free Zone Ordinance" that banned the international body from La Verkin. Three weeks later the ordinance was revised, removing sections deemed unconstitutional by Utah's attorney general and the city attorney. Once again it passed on a 3-2 vote.
The council's action didn't sit well with most voters. Citizens refused to reinstate the mayor for a second term, even though he didn't have a vote in the matter. He did, however, vigorously support the ordinance. In addition, two police officers quit in protest, and two council members who supported the new law didn't seek re-election.
Those candidates who did win a seat on the next council were not fans of the city's anti-U.N. stance. In fact, as its first action of official business in 2002, the new council voted to revoke the ordinance that had thrust this small town into the spotlight.
The Utah House resolution was forwarded to the full House on Tuesday. It doesn't require state Senate or gubernatorial approval. If it passes, it will be sent to the Utah delegation and Congress
The measure carries no power of law.
Still, Snow, the council's original supporter of the anti-U.N. ordinance, sees the legislative effort as validation of his successful effort to gather enough signatures to place a referendum on November's ballot to overturn the council's decision and reinstate La Verkin's revised ordinance.
Debi Groves, the city recorder, said developing the referendum's language so that it is clear and not misleading will be a challenge.
"I want people to know exactly what they're doing when they vote yes or no on the referendum," said Groves. "The terminology on the referendum needs to be straight and forthright."


La Verkin Councilman Al Snow displays a sign representing his sentiments on the United Nations.

Nancy Perkins, Deseret News



Voters could easily get confused on the referendum's purpose, since the United Nations Free Zone Ordinance was passed, then revised and passed a second time, and eventually repealed, she said.
"I am definitely going to send out a voter information pamphlet sometime after July," Groves said. "We've talked about having open houses and getting public input on the referendum language, but I don't know if we'll do that for sure. But the desire is there, and that's my intent."
The original ordinance made it illegal for U.N. personnel or facilities to be located within city limits and for any U.N.-funded programs or sponsored activities to take place there. It also sought to protect residents from being forced to serve the United Nations in any capacity and restricted the city from investing in anything related to the global organization.
Those who worked for La Verkin were prohibited from cooperating with U.N. activities, and residents who worked for any U.N.-financed project were required to file an annual report of activities with the city and post a sign stating "United Nations work conducted here."
The revised ordinance banned U.N. personnel from La Verkin and prohibited the city from flying a U.N. flag at the city offices or making financial contributions to the global organization. The ordinance also made any U.N. tax or international court decree issued by the United Nations invalid in the city. An enforcement clause would charge violators with a class-C misdemeanor.
The ordinance, even in its newest form, is bad law, says La Verkin Police Chief Kim Seegmiller.
"I don't think the referendum should pass, and I think it's unenforceable," Seegmiller said. "I simply believe the referendum imposes an individual's opinion about the United Nations on others, and government shouldn't do that."

 

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]

Back to Current Edition Citizen Review Archive LINKS Search This Site