EPA eases clean-air rules, 9 states sue
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration issued rules yesterday to make it easier for industrial plants and refineries to modernize without having to buy expensive pollution controls — and immediately was sued by nine states charging that the changes undermine their efforts to protect public health.
The Environmental Protection Agency regulations, which take effect in March, amount to a major change in the way industrial plants will have to deal with air pollution when they expand, make big repairs or modify operations.
While the administration called the new approach badly needed to remove barriers to innovation and increased productivity, the lawsuit — filed hours after the changes became final — argues that breaks given to industry amount to a "gutting" of the 1970 law credited with major air-quality improvements.
The changes "will bring more acid rain, more smog, more asthma, and more respiratory diseases to millions," said N.Y. Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, calling them "a betrayal of the right of Americans to breathe clean, healthy air."
Along with New York, eight other Northeastern states — Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont — joined in the suit.
Northeastern officials are concerned about the potential for increased industrial and power-plant pollution because much of the chemical releases from coal-burning power plants and older factories in the Midwest and Ohio Valley drift eastward, making it harder for their states to meet air-quality standards.
The rule changes have been in the works since the early weeks of the Bush administration. A wide range of industries lobbied heavily for an easing of the rules, arguing they keep companies from making needed improvements.
Among the changes:
• Companies will be given greater flexibility to modernize or expand without having to install new pollution controls, although the changes might lead to greater air emissions.
• Plants that have installed state-of-the-art pollution controls will be assured they will not be required for 10 years to install more effective equipment even if they expand or change operations in a way that results in greater pollution.
• Plants with numerous pollution sources may increase pollution from some sources as long as overall, plant-wide air emissions are not increased.
• Companies are given greater leeway in calculating pollution to reduce the likelihood that new pollution controls will be required.
The states' lawsuit argues that all of these measures violate the 1970 Clean Air Act, which exempted older plants from having the kind of emission controls newer facilities had to have — but only under the condition that they not expand or make changes that significantly increase smokestack emissions.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]