Court kills effort to list goshawk as threatened - Center for
Biological Diversity sues to challenge logging plans in 11 national
forests, based in part on effect on goshawk
A federal appeals court has rejected efforts to classify the northern goshawk as threatened or endangered.
In a unanimous ruling Monday, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said there is no evidence that the bird "is endangered or likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future."
Based on that, the judges said, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did not act improperly in rejecting the request to list the species.
The bird has been known to live in Arizona's Coronado, Apache-Sit-greaves, Coconino and Kaibab forests.
The court decision was criticized by Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Tucson-based Center for Biological Diversity. He said the court - just like the Fish and Wildlife Service - ignored evidence presented by his organization showing goshawk populations declining.
"There are virtually no goshawks left on the West Coast," he said.
In Arizona, Suckling said, the state Game and Fish Department has had a 10-year monitoring program in the Sitgreaves National Forest where there is virtually no old growth left. "Goshawk populations have been going down the tubes," he said. "And that was before the Rodeo-Chediski Fire."
The petition, filed in 1991, sought the listing of the entire goshawk population in forested areas west of the 100th parallel - basically all the territory west of Texas and Oklahoma. It took a separate federal lawsuit to get the agency to study the issue.
Judge Donald P. Lay, writing for the unanimous appellate court in this case, said a team of nine wildlife biologists assembled by the Fish and Wildlife Service concluded the goshawk population was well distributed throughout the 222 million acres at issue and found no evidence that its range had significantly diminished.
Lay said that team also concluded that existing foresting activities were unlikely to affect the goshawk. Based on that, the Fish and Wildlife Service concluded in 1998 there was no reason for listing - a decision Monday's ruling said should not be disturbed.
Suckling noted that the Center for Biological Diversity has a separate lawsuit pending that would challenge logging plans in 11 national forests in Arizona and New Mexico, based at least in part on the effect that would have on the goshawk.
Note from one of our readers: As recently as the Aspen fire in the Santa Catalina Mountains, north of Tucson, Arizona, the center stated they were not suing the USFS over logging plans.
The center is talented at generating half truths. As you will read below the center is attempting to use plant and animal species in their drive to halt responsible forest management nation wide.
In this manner they are able to state with a straight face that they are not suing the U.S. Forest Service to halt logging (thinning) controlled burns or removal of dead and down trees from earlier fires.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]