Growing pains: $85k grant in jeopardy
Sequim, WA - The fledgling Sequim Growers Cooperative will have to
work through growing pains before it receives an $85,000 grant awarded
After a leadership shake-up in mid-April - when four members of the
six-person elected board stepped down - remaining co-op members are
working to complete unfinished grant prerequisites so they can get
Despite the shake-up, the United States Department of Agriculture
- which administers the grant - is not giving up on the co-op and
is working with the group's current leaders to meet the grant requirements.
John Bruegger, state administrator of the USDA grant program, said
he met with co-op founding president Tom Mix and the new board to
strengthen the organization and help it meet grant requirements that
had not yet been met.
A lavender industry feasibility study done as a part of the Clallam
County Economic Development Council's Agriculture Industry Cluster's
work in 2002 lauded by Mix as the "professional business plan"
was insufficient to meet the government's grant requirements to distribute
Bruegger explained that the co-op needs to submit a more in-depth
business plan - he characterized the plan submitted with the application
as a "preliminary plan" - that includes the organizational
structure and marketing plan before the $85,084 grant could actually
be turned over. Until that happens, the money can't be given to the
co-op, he said.
In the meantime, the department will continue to provide assistance
to make sure the co-op continues, Bruegger said.
"We intend to continue to support this activity," he said.
"We're not gonna pull the rug out from under them unless it becomes
obvious that this isn't a viable organization."
So far, that's not the case, he said. It's just a new kid on the block
and needs some nurturing to develop, he said.
To that end, the USDA will provide director training, marketing assistance,
and "anything that would help them make the operation more viable,"
The co-op formed in February 2003 to enable small growers to band
together, pool their lavender and other resources to produce a product
line they could market, sell cooperatively, and share the profits.
The concept was touted by state Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Hoquiam, county
commissioner Mike Dougherty, D-Port Angeles, and Art Greenburg of
the Resource Conservation and Development Council. Members and supporters
of the organization committed an additional $130,000 of "in-kind
donations," mostly in time (sometimes called "sweat equity")
to get the business running at the level required for it to turn a
profit after the first year.
However, the co-op began to dissolve even before this spring.
Several early members drifted away from the group during the past
year and a half dozen or so original board members stepped down in
December for a variety of reasons.
Some resigned for mundane reasons like founding member Magdelena Bassett
who said she merely needed more time for other activities and was
still a co-op member, though not as actively as in the past.
"It's a great idea," Bassett said.
Paired with the April board resignations, a majority of the co-op
lavender farmers left the organization when board members quit. Nine
farms with about 80 percent of the co-op's lavender plants left, said
former treasurer Robert Jewell. Jewell, who isn't a grower, resigned
his post soon after the four board members quit. Others who left cited
numbers in the same ballpark as Jewell, though Patricia Star - one
of the founding members of the growers co-op who remained on the elected
board along with co-founder Nancy Radich when the other four members
resigned - said she disagreed with the numbers.
"I'm not comfortable with any of those numbers," she said,
explaining that some co-op members haven't announced whether they
are in or out and those remaining have planted new lavender that could
alter the numbers. She said she thought seven farms, not four as Jewell
claimed, remain in the co-op.
"It's still viable," she said. "It's just going a little
A conflict brews
The dispute that led to the board resignations and withdrawal of a
majority of the co-op's lavender growers boils down to issues of personality
In short, they didn't like the way Mix had run things and continued
to influence co-op business after the new board took office.
Jewell said when the new board took office in March they found the
co-op's finances in shambles, obligated to some $40,000 debt with
no way of paying for it without the grant.
Most of the debt was in the form of a $30,000 contract developed by
the former board to market co-op product, Jewell said. Mix and the
contractor signed the agreement immediately prior to interviews with
three other potential marketing contractors, Jewell said. Co-op members
and the new board didn't learn of the contract until March, and didn't
learn when it had been signed until a few weeks later, he said.
Mix continued to act on the co-op's behalf without board authorization
and members feared he would obligate the co-op to even more debt,
With the grant money in doubt and no money available to do the business
plans and analysis needed to receive it, extra debt was something
the co-op could ill afford, Jewell said.
"Any way you slice it, in my opinion, (the co-op) was mismanaged,"
Jewell said. Jewell, who said he has accounting degrees and was a
government fraud investigator for 25 years, said his professional
opinion is there was no fraud involved but that people had been misled.
Mix did not respond to telephone messages left the mornings of June
7 and 8 seeking his comments.
Star said that many of the co-op members who left the organization
this spring hadn't been involved in the grant application process
and lacked the background information to make an informed judgment.
"I knew most of the accusations were of their own imagination,"
Star said. "Just because a few people disagree with what's going
on doesn't mean it's a bad thing."
Star said she chose to remain because the co-op was her "baby"
and she didn't want to let it go.
Jim Brown - a current board member who was on the founding co-op board
- echoed Star's sentiments.
"There was no reason to let it slide," he said.
Brown said many in the organization didn't want to let it go when
the elected board resigned.
"We put too much sweat equity into it," he said, noting
like any new organization or company there were bound to be growing
pains that would have to be worked through.
Robert Couch, one of the four elected co-op leaders who resigned,
said he had no comment on the events that led to his resignation.
He later added: "It's a sad situation. Maybe someday you'll know
the full story."
Couch, who is looking forward to his first lavender season, confirmed
that he and several of the other lavender growers who left the co-op
are working together and with other area lavender producers to market
He has at least one thing in common with the remaining co-op growers:
Lavender season is fast approaching and growers of the fragrant herb,
co-op and otherwise, are working hard to prepare.
--by Leif Nesheim
Gazette staff writer
Copyright © 2004 Olympic View Publishing. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
for any commercial purpose without permission of the Sequim Gazette.