Big bill for small ponds: Ecology notifies property owners of unsafe dams

By Paul Gottlieb
Peninsula Daily News


3/29/09
EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the first of a two-part series on the designation of six water impoundment areas as illegal, hazardous dams.

Clallam County, WA - Six North Olympic Peninsula property owners -- including forest-product companies in Port Angeles and Port Townsend -- have been told they have illegal, unpermitted, mostly earthen dams on their property that could endanger human life should they fail.

The state Dam Safety Office, a branch of the Department of Ecology, mailed notices to 141 property owners across Washington state saying their dams are not on the state's list of permitted dams.

Safety Office officials said a dam is not simply a wall that holds back a body of water.

The state defines a dam as any impoundment of more than 10 acre-feet of water, or 3.25 million gallons -- including ponds and sewage lagoons -- which, if it failed, would flood at least one home.

Property owners were told in the notices that the Safety Office must interview them for about two hours and also inspect their dams.

That first inspection costs the property owner nothing.

But if structural integrity is lacking and the dam must be upgraded, the owners must pay the agency $1,400 to approve a dam modification plan and annual inspection fees of at least $300.

Repairs could cost a minimum of $10,000 and range to tens of thousands of dollars for extensive repairs, Dam Safety Office Supervisor Doug Johnson said.

Those repairs could range from building buttresses and spillways to draining out the water.

The Dam Safety Office will provide technical assistance and advice, but no agency funding is available to property owners.

Current property owners are responsible for repairs even if they didn't build the dam.

"They are kind of stuck with this white elephant, and stuck with fixing them up or making or breaching them so they can't pose a risk," Johnson said.

In their notices, the property owners were told: "We anticipate that many dams will need at least some structural modifications to resolve a threat to their integrity or to provide adequate spillway capacity."

Two categories

Property owners received notices for two kinds of dams: high-hazard and significant-hazard dams:

• A significant-hazard dam could flood one or two homes if it failed, causing significant property damage.

• A high-hazard dam could flood three or more homes if it failed, causing significant property damage and loss of life.

The state pinpointed four high-hazard dams in Clallam County and two significant-hazard dams in Jefferson County.

Clallam County's high-hazard dams are owned by Interfor Pacific Inc. forest products company on U.S. Highway 101, west of Port Angeles; Andrew Shogren on Deer Park Road, south of Bear Meadow Road; Dale and Carol Lohrer on Melton Road, west of Port Angeles; and Douglas Short near Jimmycomelately Creek, east of Sequim.

The two significant-hazard dams in Jefferson County are owned by Russell Lowry in Chimacum and Port Townsend Paper Co.

Those with high- or significant-hazard dams also will pay an annual inspection fee for non-annual inspections for as long as they own the properties.

If the dams are high-hazard, the property owner must pay $814 a year for Ecology to inspect the dam every five years.

If the dams are significant hazard, the property owner must pay $297 a year for Ecology inspections every 10 years.

"We pro-rate it so they don't get hit with a big bill all at once," Johnson said.

What's a dam?

The definition of a dam was broadened in the '70s and early '80s while the Army Corps of Engineers inspected dams nationwide as part of the National Dam Safety Program, Johnson said.

"At that time, the definition was expanded to include not just traditional dams but waste ponds or any type of impoundment that holds a liquid," he said.

"We started looking at any impoundment as being created by a dam."

But the agency issued permits only for new ponds, sewage lagoons, dams and other impoundment areas, not existing ones.

"We didn't look for existing stuff," Johnson said.

"There were lots of waste ponds but no effort to bring them into compliance," Johnson said. "The current effort we are looking at predates 1980."

An Ecology intern discovered the abundance of unpermitted dams while she was doing an inventory of bodies of water more than 2 acres in the state's agricultural areas.

Using aerial photos, the department identified existing dams with houses downstream.

"But there were a lot of other apparent dams that we knew didn't have a permit," Johnson said.

Five dams failed in Washington in the last 15 years. All were unpermitted.

"We decided, gee, we are finding so many [unpermitted dams] by happenstance, we should see what's out there."

Spillways

The biggest problem with these dams is the lack of adequate overflow spillways, Johnson said.

Most part property owners have been cooperative when they learn they have an illegal dam, Johnson said.

Most also didn't even know they had a dam on their property.

"People who have called in have primarily been like, 'I don't have a dam. That's a pond I see, not a dam,'" Johnson said.

If property owners don't fix their dams, they can be fined $5,000 a day.

"Basically, if they don't cooperate with what we are telling them to do, we can issue orders, or fine them," Johnson said.

"But we wield that stick very cautiously. We get more done that way. We are trying to work with the property owners."

On Monday: Property owners express shock, take stock.

________

Staff writer Paul Gottlieb can be reached at 360-417-3536 or at paul.gottlieb@peninsuladailynews.com.

All materials Copyright © 2008 Horvitz Newspapers.


 

Pond owners get notices they have illegal dams

By Paul Gottlieb
Peninsula Daily News

Posted 3/30/09


EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the second of a two-part series on the designation of six water impoundment areas as illegal, hazardous dams.


SEQUIM -- Doug Short, who grew up in Sequim and lives part-time in Port Townsend, wanted to do "that karma thing."

He leased his hatchery to the state of Washington to help revive historic Jimmycomelately Creek west of Sequim and doesn't profit from the deal, although the salmon-bearing waterway goes through his property.

He also fenced his portion of the creek with 200-foot setbacks when only 50 feet was required and donated that property to the public to guarantee the habitat would be forever protected.

But recently the state Dam Safety Office of the Department of Ecology sent him a letter telling him a water impoundment area on his property is actually a high-hazard earthen dam.

The agency named it the Short-Brower Dam ¬­-- for him and his wife, Vanessa Brower -- and said it could endanger at least three nearby homes.

He thought he just had a pond, and now he has a dam named after him that he's been told could cause the death of his neighbors if it fails.

"I never really looked at it as a dam," Short said.

"It's a pond. It's for watering cattle, to feed my hatchery, which does endangered species.

"When you do good deeds, you're supposed to get it back ¬­-- that karma thing. It's seems like it's not working out that way with this property."

Short, who has an engineering background, expects he'll have to enlarge the pond.

Work of that magnitude will cost upward of $100,000 if he does it right, he said, and he's hoping for help from the Jamestown S'Klallam tribe or the Clallam Conservation District.

Enlarge pond

Neither Short nor 140 other property owners who recently received bombshell notices that they had significant- or high-hazard dams on their property will get financial help from the state to upgrade their dams.

A significant-hazard dam could damage one or two homes if it fails. There are two in Jefferson County.

A high-hazard dam could damage three or more homes and cause loss of life if it fails. There are four in Clallam County.

Neither Short nor five other property owners who received notices on the North Olympic Peninsula were aware they had dams on their property, they said in interviews. They said they thought they just had ponds or lakes.

The responsibility for DOE-approved repairs rests with the present property owners.

In 1971, Short's uncle bought the property Short and his wife now own, and the pond was already there.

Short bought the property in 1991 for $250,000.

"If I had known this was a pending issue, I would have never done it," Short said.

"I think it sucks. If they truly had these laws, why didn't they enforce them?

"I'm all for public safety, but not when you get blind-sided like this."

Other dams

Below are other, nonpermitted, high-hazard dams in Clallam County:

• Third Mountain Dam

He thought it was just a lake.

That's why Andrew Shogren, 44, of Sequim bought 13.7 acres of undeveloped land on Deer Park Road east of Port Angeles for $175,000 in 1995.

It captures runoff from a nearby watershed.

"You knew there was a path around the lake," he said.

"I did not know it was a dam. I was very surprised to get the letter. I thought it was a lake on 13 acres of property.

"It was the reason we purchased the property. I had to sit down to digest it to really understand where they were coming from. It was quite a shock."

But the dam impounding the water has multiple and serious structural problems, said Dam Safety Office Inspector Guy Hoyle-Dotson.

Trees growing on the crest have penetrated the dam, providing pathways for seepage.

If a tree falls, exposing a root bowl, it could uproot part of the crest, Hoyle-Dotson said.

For Hoyle-Dotson's office even to inspect the dam, Shogren must clear the vegetation.

Shogren will have to install a spillway, at the very least, Hoyle-Dotson said.

Four nearby houses are endangered by the dam, he said.

While his office doesn't know how many people live in the four houses endangered by the dam, the equation the office uses is four people per house.

"Other houses could also be impacted," he said.

Just 100 paces off Deer Park Road and visible to motorists, Shogren's lake was a popular neighborhood recreation spot before Shogren bought it.

A sign posted on a tree warns that any previous invitations to use it for hunting, fishing or other recreation are no longer valid.

Illegal hunting has occurred there and other warning signs torn down, it says.

Shogren is expecting the fix to cost about $20,000.

"Hopefully, it will cost under six figures," Shogren said.

• Interfor Pacific Dam

A storage pond at the Interfor lumber and building products mill on U.S. Highway 101 west of Port Angeles has a valid stormwater permit issued by Ecology, mill manager Steve Kroll said.

The Dam Safety Office said the pond has a wall in the back, Kroll said.

"They consider that a dam," he said.

The pond is intended to hold water that then evaporates on its own.

It was built in 1998, meeting water quality standards for Ecology, "but the Dam Safety Office was not informed of it," Hoyle-Dotson said.

"We haven't done a breach analysis, but going by what it looks like is close to the breach path, at least a half a dozen homes could be hit. Based on that, it makes it a high-hazard dam."

Kroll said, "We'll do whatever DOE wants us to do."

• Lohrer Dam

Dale and Carol Lohrer's pond could potentially endanger 15 downstream homes, all within a 6-foot elevation of the breach path, Hoyle Dotson said.

The water is impounded "in a very large wetland" on Melton Road southwest of Port Angeles, he said, estimating its size at 50 acre-feet.

"That's why it came to our attention."

Dale Lohrer said the pond had already been inspected.

"They said we were not a problem," he said.

But Johnson said Friday no final decision had been reached.

"We think it's probably not be a problem, but we need to review our survey results, just to confirm," he said.

________

Staff writer Paul Gottlieb can be reached at 360-417-3536 or at paul.gottlieb@peninsuladailynews.com.


All materials Copyright © 2008 Horvitz Newspapers.

 

 

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]

Back to Current Edition Citizen Review Archive LINKS Search This Site