|
Coalition
fights critical habitat designation - Fish & Wildlife has
violated ESA by failing to conduct a proper economic analysis, says group "We believe the Fish and Wildlife Service has violated the Endangered
Species Act by failing to conduct a proper economic analysis of their
designation of critical habitat for the shiner," said Ross Wilson, Texas
Cattle Feeders Association vice president.
"The service is saying basically that there will be no economic impact
from designating critical habitat. We believe the opposite is true,"
Wilson said.
About 98 percent of the total critical habitat area is held in private
ownership and habitat designation could restrict land use and groundwater
pumping in the listed areas, according to those filing the lawsuit.
"We have maintained all along and continue to maintain that
designating critical habitat isn't necessary," Wilson said. "We have
also repeatedly said that the government failed to follow its own definition
for critical habitat and has failed to use adequate scientific and economic
evidence."
USFWS officials in Tulsa, Okla., said they were not aware of the lawsuit.
Officials at the Albuquerque office could not be reached for comment.
USFWS listed areas of critical habitat for the Arkansas River Shiner in
four states comprising the Arkansas River Basin, including the Cimarron River
in Oklahoma and Kansas; the Beaver/North Canadian River in Oklahoma; the
Canadian/South Canadian River in Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas; and the
Arkansas River in Kansas.
The shiner was listed as threatened in November 1998, Wilson said, and at
that time, the USFWS determined that critical habitat designation would not
provide any additional benefit.
However, USFWS made the habitat designation in March 2001 as part of a
court-ordered settlement of a lawsuit filed by the environmental group, the
Center for Biological Diversity.
Critical habitat is defined as specific geographic areas that are essential
for the conservation and recovery of a threatened or endangered species and
that may require special management considerations.
Kent Satterwhite, general manager of the Canadian River Municipal Water
Authority, said they too are a part of the coalition and the lawsuit.
"We're concerned about the critical habitat designation, which comes
up onto our flood pool on the lake," Satterwhite said. "If the lake
were to fill up into the flood pool, they could potentially require us to
drain the lake down because of that. That's really our biggest issue."
The coalition TCFA and CRMWA has joined represents thousands of farmers,
ranchers and other landowners affected by the designation.
Lawyers for the coalition are Michael Klein and Craig Douglas of Smith,
Robertson, Elliott & Glen, L.L.P. in Austin.
Included as defendants in the lawsuit are Gale Norton, U.S. Secretary of
the Interior; and Steve Williams, director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The coalition consists of New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, Texas
& Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association, Oklahoma Farm Bureau, Kansas
Farm Bureau, CRMWA, TCFA, High Plains Underground Water Conservation District,
Environmental Federation of Oklahoma, ProAg of Oklahoma, Settlers Ditch Co.,
Oklahoma Farmers Union, Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association, Hitch Enterprises,
Panhandle Groundwater Conservation District, Kansas Livestock Association,
North Plains Underground Water Conservation District and Oklahoma Panhandle
Irrigation and Agriculture Association.
The Oklahoma Agricultural Legal Foundation is coordinating the coalition's
efforts. |
|
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml] |